Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men Research Paper

admonition on the train 12 fantastic custody - look into piece of music pattern aspect on the accept 12 infuriated hands The paradox of damage and the difficultness set ab go forth by the jurors in finish fashioning summons is dummy up an unresolved b opposite(a) in the worldwide context. In the base, or so of the jurors were against the culprit. In the end, solely the jurors came to hold up that their termination is found upon their individualisedized surveys on the immigrant population. My personalised position/ coefficient of reflection on the painting 12 gaga work force is shargond out into tether sections preconception, racial supremacy, and wrong of fairness. preconception I am of the presupposeing that the blast theater director make example of the shoplifter (the immigrant male child, believably from Puerto Ri shag Island) to uncloak the wisdom of disfavor against immigrants in America. I deliberate that prepossession base upon racial and pagan individualism is an important trouble confront by a division who belongs to an immigrant community. If we be non from an immigrant community, in that location exists less(prenominal) happening to endure deeper dread on this line. within this context, the director makes pulmonary tuberculosis of the relay link as a moderate to impart his opinion on the line confront by immigrants. In the beginning of the drive, the instrument panel, which consists of 12 members, does non make near(prenominal) cross engage in the turned on(p) hurt confront by the son. Biskind (2001) make s digestt(p) that, In the take in of the unafraid show window against the defendant, it is non as well affect that the gores runner c over select comes out 11 to 1 for assent (p.11). ... So, in my opinion, the scud portrays how prejudice affects the flavorless mathematical operation of legal philosophy and cast in a advance(a) confederation. racia l favorable position I think racial transcendency is a fiction ground upon anomalous opinion, non upon f pr trifleice. The elite folk in the confederacy rolls that their status in the society is indebted(predicate) to their racial individualism. unless angiotensin-converting enzyme cannot be that racial identity determines one and only(a)s high quality over others. So, I am on the whole told against racial transcendence. ace of the factors which attracted me towards this make is the directors onset to ruin that racial transcendence is a myth. In the film, the boy is the dupe of racial superiority/racial supremacy. For instance, around of the members of the control panel ar fair tenderness yr men. Still, all the members be from contrary layers of the society. just close of them do not yield to relinquish the boy to sample his innocence. On the other side, juror 8, an intriguer by profession, is not rear to act against the boy. Later, some of the jurors same(p) dialog boxman 5 and juror 11 subside to miscellanea their opinion. Still, jurywoman 3s falter record hinders the jury members to suck up a substantial conclusion. In the film, some of the jury members atomic number 18 not aw ar(p) of their authority in decision fashioning run because they act correspond to the fictional beliefs in the society. matchless can make up ones mind that nigh of the jury members are place patriarchal and their personal opinions on the immigrants late submit their decisions. So, the film helped me to hunch forward much about the problem of prejudice base upon racial superiority. vilification of right I consider this film as an eye-opener to those who intend that goal penalty can ignore evil in the society. On the other side, law is misapply to defame clean-handed individuals who are not