.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Did September 11 Kill Democracy? :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

Did September 11 Kill Democracy? The September 11 terrorist ack-ack on the States has provoked a strong response. Americans are at state of war. On television, from the mouths of politicians, in newspapers, this response is portrayed as unequivocal. As with Pearl Harbor, war has been declared on America. We have no choice but to respond with unpresidented military force. Other considerations might give us a pause, if they were non being quietly swept under the rug by those eagerly pressing for war. Isnt war and violence precisely what terrorists are after? Rather than pitting ourselves against the Arab-Muslim solid ground and lumping every Muslim in with the terrorists, shouldnt we draw closer to those elements in the Arab world that reject terrorism? Most importantly, shouldnt we attempt to fully understand why America was targeted? Do Americans truly appreciate the role of the United States in the Middle eastern United States? Are our politicians and news media attempting to increase our understanding of events in the Middle East before we plunge headlong into war? None of these questions are being addressed. This is why the past few days have been so terrifying. A mischance can happen to any nation, but a democracy requires thoughtful debate and exposure to the necessary information before a democratic ending can be made. To quote Representative Lee of California, Weve got to bring these perpetrators to justice. But Im saying that I have not yet seen the evidence. And until then, in Congress, we must surface restraint. Representative Lee was the only Representative who voted against authorizing military force on Friday. This fact alone is shocking and should be worrisome. Where is the democratic debate when, a skimp 4 days after the events, all of Congress decides for the nation that there is no alternative to military action? Without full knowledge of who was involved in the events, and careful consideration of all possible alternatives, what are they basing their decision on? The messages from network television has been similarly alarming in its uniformity. Already on Tuesday, newscasters were not presenting democratic alternatives, but speculating about military targets. Is that the best that we can do as a nation, reach for our guns, striking out in anger quite a than justice? If CNN starts an article with The questions are only when and where, isnt CNN is deliberately encouraging its audience not to ask other questions?

No comments:

Post a Comment