It’s the End of the Worldand I Feel Fine Essay -- essays papers

Its the End of the Worldand I Feel FineIts the End of the Worldand I Feel Fine(The section of intellectuals in the creation and justification of thermo thermo atomic weapons.) In Fail Safe and Dr. Strangelove, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, Sidney Lumet and Stanley Kubrick question the family relationship between technology and tender-heartedity by emphasizing mankinds tendency to create machines that cannot be adequately controlled. By blatantly bring out the absurdity of game theory (Mutual Assured Destruction as a reasonable deterrence for nuclear war), both(prenominal) directors call into question the prevalent pro-Cold War American ideology. One of the most quintessential aspects of this ideology includes the tease for constant technological advance and strategic superiority. Without the brainpower of the scientists and intellectuals who dedicated their lives to the fender of technological power and the study of internationalist conflict, the Arms Race would certainly not have been possible. These academics not only became the architects of atomic weapons but they were as well as faced with justifying the workout of these nuclear bombs, and creating a theoretical framework indoors which nuclear warfare might be appropriately (and rationally) conducted. Within this context, iodine noteworthy parallel between Fail Safe and Dr. Strangelove is the existence (in both films) of a single intellectual genius that actively perpetuates the science of nuclear advancement and strategy. Indeed, through the characterizations of Professor Groeteschele and Dr. Strangelove, both Lumet and Kubrick examine the prominent role of intellectuals (both scientists and theorists) in the creation and justification of nuclear warfare. Ultimately, both Lumet and Kubrick reveal the problems with relying completely on science and mathematics to resolve international conflict, thus suggesting that innovative warfare requires a more human istic, ethical definition of right and wrong. twain Fail Safe and Dr Strangelove serve as moralizing responses to the dominant American Cold War culture, rhetoric, and political policy. In his article titled Dr. Strangelove (1964) nightmare Comedy and the ideology of Liberal Consensus, Charles Maland identifies the dominant American cultural epitome (during the Cold War) as the Ideology of the Liberal Consensus. Maland maintains that the Ideology of the ... ...ocosm of possible nuclear disasters, both directors choose to include a character that embodies the contemporary nuclear intellectual. Indeed, scientists and theoreticians (like Groeteschele and Strangelove) played a prominent role in defining and perpetuating the wise Cold War culture. These academics not only became the architects of nuclear bombs but they were besides faced with creating a viable theoretical framework within which the use of these weapons would be both recommended and justified. However, both Kubrick a nd Lumet suggest that in order to contribute their brilliance towards mass destruction and death, intellectuals must give up a portion of their humanity, becoming increasingly more like the devices they create and defend. The joint catastrophes that occur in Fail Safe and Dr. Strangelove show the inevitability of human weakness and scientific fallibility. Through the development of Professor Groeteschele and Dr. Strangelove, both Lumet and Kubrick beautify the catastrophic possibilities of relying solely on science and mathematics to resolve international conflicts. Ultimately, modern, high stake warfare requires a more humanistic, ethical enrol of right and wrong.